Government Mandated School Lunch Menus - Find That In The US Constitution!

Michelle Obama's campaign against obesity, on the surface, sounds like a worthy, goal-oriented program. However, its implementation is hardly appropriate, rational, or within the scope of the authority of the Federal Government.

Like her husband's approach to almost everything, rather than making a genuine case for something, backed up up by logic and a willingness of the American people, she is "ramrodding" her "mission" down the throats of the American people. Rather than making the case for the unhealthy aspects of obesity and selling THAT to the public, the Government has mandated a "Michelle-approved" luch menu of sorts to all schools.

First, the powers granted the government (US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8) specify a limited set of things the government may do. Mandating what any of us eat "ain't" on the list. Oh, I know, since the government gives money to the schools the government has the right to withhold funds if the schools don't do what it says. But, giving money to schools "ain't" on the list either.

Second, metabolisms and food allergies vary - individual to individual. What may be healthy for one might be harmful or inadequate to another. As such, "one size" does not fit all. Be careful what you mandate - you could kill somebody.

Third, while the Obamas like to tell all of us what is best for us, they, themselves, seem not able to pass a fast food, high calorie joint without "pigging out". Hypocritical? You betcha!

Below is a recent article on this subject. It's worth the read.


Complaints Mount Against Michelle Obamaís New Lunch Menu

by Kyle Olson,

Sep 23, 2012

In Wisconsin, high school athletes are complaining about not getting enough to eat each day, due to the skimpy new school lunch menu mandated by the United States Department of Agriculture and First Lady Michelle Obama.

The story we published earlier this week on that subject is unfortunately not unique. Students across the country are complaining about the new school lunch regulations.

Perhaps the real motive is to starve students into slimming down. Just ask students in Pierre, South Dakota who, too, are in an all-out revolt.

"I know a lot of my friends who are just drinking a jug of milk for their lunch. And they are not getting a proper meal," middle school student Samantha Gortmaker told

Despite the fact that the new regulations have increased the cost of a lunch 20 to 25 cents per plate, itís not pleasing students.

Some are throwing away their vegetables while others are adapting to the rules by becoming industrious. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, students have created a black market - for chocolate syrup. The kiddie capitalists are smuggling in bottles of it and selling it by the squeeze, according to

Nancy Carvalho, director of food services for New Bedford Public Schools, was quoted as saying that hummus and black bean salads have been tough sells in elementary cafeterias. That means even smaller children are going through the day fighting hunger pains, which can never be considered a good thing.

One government official tried to put the blame on the students.

"One thing I think we need to keep in mind as kids say they're still hungry is that many children aren't used to eating fruits and vegetables at home, much less at school. So it's a change in what they are eating. If they are still hungry, it's that they are not eating all the food that's being offered," USDA Deputy Undersecretary Janey Thornton was quoted as saying.

Ms. Thornton just put her finger on the problem. The government is trying to impose a new diet that children are not accustomed to. Itís not reasonable to expect them to either eat what the government deems healthy or go hungry.

Many will opt to go hungry, and thatís the governmentís fault.


This link is to a parody on this subject. Makes the point fairly clearly - Click Here.