Of course everyone is entitled to their opinion. This is the USA. However, when an opinion is based on a political agenda coupled with a selective presentation of "facts", such an opinion should be relegated to the "trash heap".
Read her article. Then, keep reading for my analysis of her offering.
by Dalia F. Fahmy, PhD, Professor of Political Science @ Long Island University
October 24, 2015 - The Huffington Post
Fear of Islam has become more prominent in everyday political discourse than ever before. From last weekend's nationwide Anti-Islam rallies, the controversy surrounding several mosque zonings, attempts to pass anti-Shariah legislation in 20 states, the arrest of a boy with a clock, and the vitriol coming out of the current Republican primary that questions whether Muslims in office can be trusted--it is obvious that anti-Muslim sentiment is on the rise.
According to Gallup, 48% of Muslim Americans say they have experienced racial or religious discrimination. We have seen the horrific results of this hate in the execution style murders of three young Muslims in North Carolina, the burning down of an Islamic school in Houston, when two people in Michigan who were asked if they were Muslim and they responded in the affirmative were stabbed repeatedly, and the most recent stabbing in Brooklyn.
Our political apparatus is a key culprit in this state of affairs. Political campaigns have included statements that the US is a Judaeo-Christian country, indicating that Islam has no place here, that a Muslim president could not be trusted, that Muslims should not be included in cabinet positions, and that all mosques should be closed. Essentially, America should exclude Muslims from the definition of what it means to be American.
During president Obama's last State of The Union address, when he rightly stated that the United States is a nation that will not tolerate anti-Semitism, the entire Congressional body stood up and applauded in support. In his next breath, when the President stated that America would stand against anti-Muslim sentiment, the chamber fell silent. Yet, Muslim American heard this silence, loud and clear. Muslims don't belong, and our elected officials seem to agree.
This is Islamophobia.
Islamophobia is defined as an unfounded, irrational fear or hostility towards Islam and Muslims that is perpetuated by negative stereotypes resulting in bias, discrimination, and the marginalization and exclusion of Muslims from America's social, political, and civic life. This rhetoric aims to exclude Muslims from the public sphere, essentially eliminating Muslims from the definition of what it means to be American.
Yet, this exclusion of Muslim is un-American and the un-American-ness of this exclusion was emphasized in the founding of our nation.
When President Obama was candidate Obama, and running for president, questions that began to arise, Is Obama Muslim? This led to questions of can a Muslim be president, yet this was not the first time in history that these questions were asked.
On July 30, 1788, a Federalist delegate to the North Carolina convention to ratify the United States constitution was among those who wanted to have a religious litmus test in the Constitution that only a Protestant could be president. He projected his fears for the future of the country, stating, "But let us remember that we are forming a government for millions not yet in existence. I have not that art of divination. In the course of four or five hundred years, I do not know how it will work. This is most certain, that Papists may occupy that chair, and Mahometans may take it. I see nothing against it." The chair he is speaking of is the seat of the Presidency of the United States. This delegate was vocalizing his fears over a Muslim becoming President.
The debate in 1788 over the ratification of the Constitution in North Carolina turned into a discussion on the possibility of Muslims as American citizens when at the time, most contemporary depictions represented Islam and Muslims as both theological and political threats. And what emerged in the debate over the ratification of the United States Constitution in North Carolina was an agreement that there would be no religious litmus test, and it forced Federalists to defend the future possibility of a Muslim president. And while at the heart of the founding of the US there were questions of identity, equal citizenship of Muslims, these were constitutionally deemed un-American questions.
The ideals that this country was founded on are values that most Americans hold dear. Thomas Jefferson envisioned a country that would be a safe place for people of all religions, a neutral religious ground for Christians, Jews, Mohammedans, Hindus, and Atheists. This was not meant to be exclusionary, but on the contrary, was predicated on state neutrality in matters of private conscience.
However, according to a Pew study conducted last September, 67% of Americans see Muslims in a negative light. This is because those very American values have become increasingly undermined. Islamophobia has led to the return of an exclusionary identity--where Muslims are the threat, and the inclusion of Muslims would mean a redefinition of what it is to be American. This irrationality is the heart of Islamophobia. As toxic and as strong as it is, is not new and it is inherently against American values, as it always has been.
As anti-Muslim sentiment continues to be an accepted part of our political discourse, and Islamophobia continues to rise, we are undermining the core values of our constitution and our founding principles. Continued silence and acceptance of our political candidates engaging in such vitriol is both racist and un-American."
First, let me discuss how she, in part, defines islamophobia as: ".. an unfounded, irrational fear or hostility towards Islam and Muslims . . ."
Consider, if actions are repeated over and over and over again, is it not reasonable to "fear" that such actions may be repeated? Well, of course it is. It's both common sense and human nature. Such a "fear" is neither unfounded nor irrational. Whether the actual or similar actions will occur again is beside the point. It is entirely reasonable to "fear" that they will.
As we almost continually see in the news these days, the horrendous actions of radical Islamics across the globe seem but to increase. We fail to see such actions being decried by the Muslim population - of any country - as well as being minimized by our current administration and other "world leaders".
And, don't think this type of thing is foreign to the good ole USofA.
Take a look at just some of the things going on here, right at home: terrorist attacks, honor killings, portions of States and whole cities being taken over by Islamics, our laws being usurped by Sharia law; the list goes on and on.
Further, the American people continually see the current administration, essentially our government, seeming to side with and favor Muslims whenever the situation arises - siding with their cultural aims over the laws, culture, and way of life of the American people and all that which made our Nation great.
Take for example one of the points the author of the above article presents re: "The Clock Boy". And, no, the "boy" was not arrested because he is a Muslim; he was arrested because he violated the school's rule on items of safety concern being brought into the school. The fact that what looked like a bomb was actually a clock is irrelevent - it appeared to be a bomb and caution was taken. And, never mind that the boy's father has suspected ties to radical Islamics.
The issue is that Obama invited him to the White House. Has Obama invited any of the children who have been suspended from school for using their finger as a pretend gun or who chewed a pop tart into the shape of a gun? NO! Well, what message does that send to Americans? Not a good one, for sure.
Further, when the "Ft. Hood" shooter murdered our brave military personnel, did Obama decry the shooter's actions as those of terrorism? No! Obama defined the shooter's actions as "workplace violence" denying the service personnel benefits.
Obama has done, is doing, and most likely will not do anything of substance to combat ISIS whose credo seems to be "Death To America" and "Death To Israel". In fact, Obama is the main force behind the "Iran Nuclear Deal"; Iran invoking the same credo as ISIS.
Meanwhile back at the administration, Obama has included in his administration members of the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the most ardent supporters of Islamic terrorism the world has to offer.
To add insult to injury, our female military personnel are not allowed to escort Muslim prisoners at Gitmo due to the prisoners' "cultural/religious demands" - a culture that views women as nothing more than chattel.
Now, consider that Obama's failure to enforce our immigration laws has led to the illegal entry into our country of "who knows how many" terrorists?
This administration seems to favor the "European Model"; that is multiculturalism combined with non-assimilation. Ask Europe how that's working for them right now.
OK. Enough of that. There are many, many additional references I could cite.
Reading the above, why would an American citizen be at all worried about Islamics? (Sarcasm intended!) And, yes, the vast majority of American Muslims are good, decent people. But, with them not rising up in mass to denounce the actions of the radicals, which of them can one trust?
No, what the author of the above article calls "Islamophobia" is not that at all. It's a simple matter of "being safe rather than sorry." Political correctness is not and should not be a substitute for common sense and facts.
And to you, Ms. Fahmy, being a Muslim does not constitute a "race". Therefore, even with your PhD, you have with ignorance abounding misused the term "racist" - as many of your progressive "fellow travelers" frequently do.